From: "0108" <0108@t...> Date: Sun Sep 2, 2001 12:57 pm Subject: Caucasian or sometimes Aryan. From: Dharmapada To: List Members Re: A cross post from a tantra list which was sparked by some quotes by Vivekananda. "I am very sympathetic with the attempts of indologists to negate an Aryan invasion. I say this because I am sure that there never was one. This doesn't rule out a migration, or a movement, by that race which we call Caucasian or sometimes Aryan." In the Ramayan, we see a movement of the warrior class/kshatriya, in benefit of and in the protection of the brahmins. Something like that. So why can't it be that the Caucasian race moved into the subcontinent in the distant past in order to re-inforce the Vedic culture of the Dravidian priests who were already active in some part of the subcontinent? After all, the Druids of Europe were known as great, mystical priests; so maybe the Dravids of South India had such a role in the distant past, too. And the kshatriya/warrior role is very much associated with the Caucasian race. Why would a movement of the Caucasian race have to be interpreted as an invasion? What if future archaeologists probe the ruins of Germany 5,000 years from now and find American military bases- remnants of 7-11 stores and such, and link it all back to North America? Would they then postulate that the Americans invaded Germany and brought with them Western culture? Again, why can't the movement of a military segment of society be interpreted as a re-inforcement of some type? Indologists are so caught up with the idea of not alienating the South Indians, that they lose all objectivity and refuse to recognize a movement by the Caucasian race into that area. But it is not the migration itself, it is the "invasion" interpretation which gets imposed upon the migration which is negative. The truth is that Aryan civilization is not the domain of the Caucasian race, that it was practiced by different races. For example, it was practiced from Northern Europe all the way to Angor Wat in present Thailand, which was known by its Vedic name Siam, or Shyama, shortened to Shyam. But the Caucasians were also practitioners of the culture, and it is easy to track their diaspora, all the way to the Arctic coasts, through the steppes of Central Asia, and 'round about along Europe. This doesn't mean that the culture was carried from India by Indo-European tribes marching across the frozen landscape. Complex verb conjugations and declensions of nouns can hardly be conserved by fixed populations with some schooling, what to speak of having them carried by nomads, conserved, and then absorbed by other populations. There was a broad, Vedic culture across large segments of the surface of the globe, broader than just the diaspora of the Indo-European race, but even referring to that race, I have to disagree with the words of Vivekananda: 'There is not one word in our scriptures, not one, to prove that the Aryans came from anywhere outside of India, and in ancient India was included Afghanistan. There it ends.' Where is the "scripture" which treats the origin and growth of Vedic culture on this planet? There isn't one, but the lack of a specific book on the subject matter doesn't negate that there was migration into India. First of all, so much literature has been lost. It is Kali Yuga, you know. The Puranas themselves underwent a strange revision about 2,000 years ago. I say strange because it was carried out from top to bottom of the Indian sub continent. How was that done in such a complete and uniform manner? But even so, the Vedic literature does remain speaks of a cyclic re-population of the surface of the globe, by members of Vedic culture, originating from the area of Shambhala, which is defined as a city in the Madhyatah, the central cavity of the Earth. This would account for Bal Gangadhar Tilak's "Arctic Home of the Vedas." But in spite of several such comments in the Puranas, indologists don't like to think along these lines because they can't understand nor explain comments about Shambhala, so they close their eyes to these comments and decide, on the basis of their limited understanding, that some comments are meaningful, and that others were fanciful interpolations. Dr. Frog, Ph.D., wants to know if the ocean is bigger than his well. Then he wants to know how much bigger. On my Vedic Evidence site, I have posted the comments of Vrndavan Parker on the existence of contact between the Arctic areas and the subcontinent. http://skywebsite.com/hollow/Vedic-Hollow-Earth/id19.html The comments are from his Vedica site. Again, by the end of the Kali Yuga, the whole face of the planet will be desolate. The re-population will begin at that time because the holy Vedas tell us so. Certainly, there will be an Aryan migration, a Dravidian migration, a Vedic migration - whatever you want to call it - to India as well as to other parts of the globe. And by the end of the next set of chatur-yugas, no one will be able to track its origin and everyone will sit around speculating like Dr. Frog, just as they are now. That's my two cents."