 |
|
|
|
|
IV. The Constraints on Liberation and the Cessation of Reading in UMS III.4: Description as Prescription |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Expectations about the Person Who Will Renounce |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2. The Ritual Background to Renunciation |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Prescribing Renunciation |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
V. Advaita Elitism and the Possibility of the Unauthorized Reader: Finding a Loophole |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter Five:
Theology after Advaita Vedanta:
The Text, The Truth, and The Theologian |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
I. The Practice of Comparative Theology |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
II. The Composition of the Text for Comparative Theology: Reading the Summa Theologiae and the Uttara Mimamsa Sutras Together |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Rereading Summa Theologiae I.13.4 after UMS III.3.11-13 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
a. Setting the Comparison |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
b. Finding Similarities |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
c. Finding Differences |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
d. Some Strategiesfor the Practice of Reading Amalananda and Aquinas Together |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
i. Coordination (upasamhara): Rulesfor Using Texts Together |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
ii. Superimposition (adhyasa): The Superimposition of One Text on Another |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
iii. The Comparative Conversation |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
iv. The Comparative Tension: Metaphor, Epiphor and Diaphor |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
v. Collage: Visualizing the Margins of Comparison |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Are There Incomparable Texts? The Example of ST III.46.3 |
|
|
|
| |